Quest for the right Drug
אסטרוג'ל OESTROGEL (ESTRADIOL)
תרופה במרשם
תרופה בסל
נרקוטיקה
ציטוטוקסיקה
צורת מתן:
בין-עורי : TRANSDERMAL
צורת מינון:
ג'ל : GEL
עלון לרופא
מינוניםPosology התוויות
Indications תופעות לוואי
Adverse reactions התוויות נגד
Contraindications אינטראקציות
Interactions מינון יתר
Overdose הריון/הנקה
Pregnancy & Lactation אוכלוסיות מיוחדות
Special populations תכונות פרמקולוגיות
Pharmacological properties מידע רוקחי
Pharmaceutical particulars אזהרת שימוש
Special Warning עלון לרופא
Physicians Leaflet
Adverse reactions : תופעות לוואי
4.8 Undesirable effects a. Summary of the safety profile The reporting rate of adverse drug reactions with Oestrogel was calculated as 5/10,000 patient year's corresponding to approximately five spontaneously reported cases in every 10,000 patients exposed to Oestrogel (Periodic Benefit Risk Evaluation Report 01 September 2016 to 30 November 2017). b. Tabulated list of adverse reactions Clinical trial data The table below lists adverse experiences which were reported in > 10% of patients (regardless of relationship to treatment) who received percutaneous 17beta-estradiol gel 1.25 g (containing 0.75 mg of oestradiol) or 2.5 g (containing 1.5 mg of oestradiol) or placebo gel applied once daily for 12 weeks, in a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 221 postmenopausal women. Adverse experiences (>10%) reported in a 221 patient placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal women over a 12- week period Adverse experience Placebo 0.75 mg oestradiol 1.5 mg oestradiol (n=73) (n=75) (n=73) Headache 13 13 14 Nausea 3 4 9 Breast pain 7 8 8 Infection 5 12 5 Pain 8 5 4 Vaginitis 3 8 1 Post-Marketing experience The information given below is based on extensive post marketing experience from administration of Oestrogel. Adverse effects have been ranked under headings of frequency using the following convention: very common (≥ 1/10); common (≥ 1/100; ≤ 1/10); uncommon (≥ 1/1,000; ≤ 1/100); rare (≥ 1/10,000; ≤ 1/1,000); very rare (<1/10,000); frequency not known (cannot be estimated from the available data). System organ class Frequency Not known (cannot be estimated from the available data) Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea Nervous system disorders Dizziness Headache Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders Alopecia Pruritus Undesirable effects observed with HRT products used in menopause are reported in the table below: Frequency of occurrence of adverse reactions System Organ Class Common Uncommon Rare (≥1/100; (≥1/1,000; (≥1/10,000; <1/10) <1/100) <1/1,000) Metabolism and Glucose intolerance nutrition disorders Psychiatric disorders Depression, Change in libido Mood swings Nervous system disorders Headache Vertigo, Aggravation of epilepsy Migraine Vascular disorders Venous Arterial hypertension thromboembolic disease Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea, Flatulence, Abdominal pain Vomiting Hepatobiliary disorders Liver function tests abnormalities Skin and subcutaneous Pruritus Skin decolouration, tissue disorders Acne Reproductive system and Breast swelling/pain, Benign breast Galactorrhoea breast disorders neoplasm, Breast enlargement, Increased volume Dysmenorrhoea, of uterine, Menorrhagia, Leiomyoma, Metrorrhagia, Vaginitis/vagi nal Leucorrhoea, candidiasis Endometrial hyperplasia General disorders and Weight change Asthenia Anaphylactic reaction administration site (increase or decrease), (in women with past condition history of allergic Water retention with peripheral reaction) oedema c. Description of selected adverse reactions The following risks apply in relation to systemic oestrogen/progestagen treatment: Breast cancer risk • An up to 2-fold increased risk of having breast cancer diagnosed is reported in women taking combined oestrogen- progestogen therapy for more than 5 years. • Theincreased risk in users of oestrogen-only therapy is lower than that seen in users of oestrogen- progestogen combinations. • The level of risk is dependent on the duration of use (see Section 4.4). • Absolute risk estimations based on results of the largest randomised placebo-controlled trial (WHI- study) and the largest meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies are presented. Largest meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies Estimated additional risk of breast cancer after 5 years’ use in women with BMI 27 (kg/m2) Age at Incidence per 1000 start never-users of HRT Risk ratio Additional cases per 1000 HRT users after 5 HRT over a 5 year period years (years) (50-54 years)* Oestrogen only HRT 50 13.3 1.2 2.7 Combined oestrogen-progestogen 50 13.3 1.6 8.0 *: Taken from baseline incidence rates in England in 2015 in women with BMI 27 (kg/m2). Note: Since the background incidence of breast cancer differs by EU country, the number of additional cases of breast cancer will also change proportionately. Estimated additional risk of breast cancer after 10 years’ use in women with BMI 27 (kg/m2) Age at Incidence per 1000 start never-users of HRT Risk ratio Additional cases per 1000 HRT users over HRT over a 10 year period 10 years (years) (50-59 years)* Oestrogen only HRT 50 26.6 1.3 7.1 Combined oestrogen-progestogen 50 26.6 1.8 20.8 *: Taken from baseline incidence rates in England in 2015 in women with BMI 27 (kg/m2). Note: Since the background incidence of breast cancer differs by EU country, the number of additional cases of breast cancer will also change proportionately. US WHI studies - additional risk of breast cancer after 5 years' use Age Incidence per 1000 range women in placebo Risk ratio & 95%CI Additional cases per 1000 HRT users over 5 (years) arm over 5 years years (95%CI) CEE oestrogen only 50-79 21 0.8 (0.7-1.0) -4 (-6 – 0)* CEE + MPA oestrogen-progestogen‡ 50-79 17 1.2 (1.0 – 1.5) +4 (0 – 9) *: WHI study in women with no uterus, which did not show an increase in risk of breast cancer ‡When the analysis was restricted to women who had not used HRT prior to the study there was no increased risk apparent during the first 5 years of treatment: after 5 years the risk was higher than in non-users. Endometrial cancer risk Postmenopausal women with a uterus The endometrial cancer risk is about 5 in every 1000 women with a uterus not using HRT. In women with a uterus, use of oestrogen-only HRT is not recommended because it increases the risk of endometrial cancer (see section 4.4). Depending on the duration of oestrogen-only use and oestrogen dose, the increase in risk of endometrial cancer in epidemiology studies varied from between 5 and 55 extra cases diagnosed in every 1000 women between the ages of 50 and 65. Adding a progestogen to oestrogen-only therapy for at least 12 days per cycle can prevent this increased risk. In the Million Women Study (MWS) the use of five years of combined (sequential or continuous) HRT did not increase risk of endometrial cancer (RR of 1.0 (0.8-1.2). Ovarian cancer Use of oestrogen-only or combined oestrogen-progestogen HRT has been associated with a slightly increased risk of having ovarian cancer diagnosed (see section 4.4). A meta-analysis from 52 epidemiological studies reported an increased risk of ovarian cancer in women currently using HRT compared to women who have never used HRT (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.31-1.56). For women aged 50 to 54 years taking 5 years of HRT, this results in about 1 extra case per 2000 users. In women aged 50 to 54 who are not taking HRT, about 2 women in 2000 will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer over a 5-year period. Risk of venous thromboembolism HRT is associated with a 1.3-3-fold increased relative risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), i.e. deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. The occurrence of such an event is more likely in the first year of using HT (see section 4.4). Results of the WHI studies are presented: WHI studies combined - Additional risk of VTE over 5 years' use Age Incidence per 1000 Risk ratio & 95%CI Additional cases per 1000 HRT users women in placebo range arm over 5 years (years) Oral oestrogen-only* 50-59 7 1.2 (0.6-2.4) 1 (-3 – 10) Oral combined oestrogen-progestogen 50-59 4 2.3 (1.2 – 4.3) 5 (1 – 13) *Study in women with no uterus Risk of coronary artery disease The risk of coronary artery disease is slightly increased in users of combined oestrogen- progestogen HRT over the age of 60 (see section 4.4). Risk of ischaemic stroke The use of oestrogen-only and oestrogen + progestogen therapy is associated with an up to 1.5 fold increased relative risk of ischaemic stroke. The risk of haemorrhagic stroke is not increased during use of HRT. This relative risk is not dependent on age or on duration of use, but as the baseline risk is strongly age- dependent, the overall risk of stroke in women who use HRT will increase with age, see section 4.4. WHI studies combined - Additional risk of ischaemic stroke*5 over 5 years' use Age Incidence per 1000 Risk ratio & 95%CI range women in placebo Additional cases per 1000 HRT users over 5 (years) arm over 5 years years 50-59 8 1.3 (1.1– 1.6) 3 (1 – 5) 5*no differentiation was made between ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. The following adverse reactions have also been reported in association with systemic oestrogen/ progestogen treatment: • Rash • Chloasma/ melasma • Vomiting • Abdominal pain • Breast tenderness • Breast enlargement • Fluid retention/ oedema • Weight changes • Changes in libido • Depression • Gall bladder disease • Probable dementia over the age of 65 (see section 4.4) • Skin and subcutaneous disorders: erythema multiforme, erythema nodosum, vascular purpura Reporting of suspected adverse reactions Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Any suspected adverse events should be reported to the Ministry of Health according to the National Regulation by using an online form: https://sideeffects.health.gov.il/
שימוש לפי פנקס קופ''ח כללית 1994
לא צוין
תאריך הכללה מקורי בסל
01/04/2004
הגבלות
תרופה מוגבלת לרישום ע'י רופא מומחה או הגבלה אחרת
מידע נוסף